Film Review: OSU vs PSU, 4th and 5 Inside Zone RPO

Unfortunately, last Saturday some people asked Franklin to take over the interior of his business - Bubble RPO 4 and 5. I mean, his fans challenged him on the way to the locker room and he’s ready to have a cute, sweet parliamentary debate over the charges . So what did Franklin and co-ordinating coordinator Ricky Run think about this call? Let's at least try to take advantage of their doubts and see.

The reason for the long conversion cycle

If you don’t work with fans, release calls for lengthy conversion attempts. The words “You must drop the stick” over and over again make me feel that God left in 1990 and wrote the eleventh commandment in stone. You’ve almost certainly heard fans complain that crime is only “conservative” and can “succumb”.

It is known that from match to match, strategies for higher success rates have previously been reported in lengthy conversations. After all, in big football it is usually difficult to get more than 5 yards in one game. However, doing this in one pass is usually very difficult, and before the "last draw in the game" the third and long pass can be a very effective and smart strategy game.

why

• Liner workers usually wait to leave the airspace and thus can be used to attack.
• Level 2 players often gain depth in an instant, which means they don’t have the speed to maintain attacking discipline, and in defense you can create “levels”.
• Defense coordinators often call on external defenses to confuse defensive passing passes, but these external factors often put defenses in a vulnerable position to prevent aggressive blocking.
• You protect your QB from deep falls from aggressive fronts or power shafts for tight coverage, reducing the risk of long convertible winders.

In terms of game theory, the threat of these items can weaken protection in long-term transformations and prevent their sale in subsequent transformations. The worst thing that should happen with 3 and in the long run is a punch, and even better, you can get close to the first character down to make it to 4 if you don’t choose the first one.

And now notice that in the last paragraphs I clearly said “third and longest”. Because the worst thing about a bad run is a kick. Depending on your position on the court, fourth runs and long distances may also have their place, but you need to be confident in your defensive skills and understand that you are advancing your opponent to long fields without losing in the first place. But such moments are very rare.

Arguments for the fourth and fifth rounds of the final series

So what’s the point of going to a BP games meeting that actually ends the game on Saturday? Almost certainly part of the argument is that "what we consider the best distraction should be at a distance of 5 yards." But this answer is very different if it is the 3rd and 5th in the 2nd and 4th quadrants, if there is 1 minute left between the 5th. Almost certain, even without realizing it, that choosing the final game is much more important for “successful game theory” than for “successful game theory”. But it goes without saying that the Penn State coaching staff was blinded by the idea of ​​moving forward rather than acknowledging the drama that was supposed to bring them down from the start.

How do Nitani Lions Deep Sea RPO staff consider the best choice for fourth and fifth place? There are at least two reasons why PSU coaches are confident in their ability to perform, and at least two reasons why they prefer to play from a planned perspective.

1. Perhaps this is the drama that BP represents best and feels most comfortable.
2. RPO offers many options, so not all eggs are in one basket. There is an opportunity to shoot at RB, but if the stick is missing due to the number of defenders, there is still the opportunity to throw QB or let it go (so you can effectively kill and keep the threat from 11 attackers) straight. and run away
3. OSU has conducted a brand new series with several linear and frontal games. There are examples that can be used to run games like flash games (more on that later), but in most cases these examples are designed to make pass protection more difficult. But they can also make the distance between you uncomfortable for aggressive blocking patterns if defenders change the distance after pressing if necessary, and an offensive lock can bring one defender to the right distance and prevent another defender from being detained at the right distance.
4. There are no 2 levels in the OSU structure. LBs LOS is a close match. Functional value: a) when they fall off the cover, they move and run, in which case they do not hold the pass; b) If OLs can reach and move them, the ability to use a sound break for defense will be low due to insufficient depth for this, which means that crossing the first line of defense is likely to be a big game.

So there are many arguments in favor of planning

Yes, it seems very annoying to me. It seems like OSU doesn’t suit me either.

Let us first consider the first three points. Linear tricks and play forward. The easiest way is to set an example. A common trick of the line in “transfer situations” is the EX trick (finally, let’s take 2).

VSU has some sports equipment. Continuing this trick, you can press DE to break into the jeep and continue your way with your DT, going zigzagging outside, making it very difficult for the QB to escape. But unlike running, you’re actually adding a big bubble in front of you. You gave LB a free version. The DT episode actually comes out of the drama.

And every extra deep forehead has the same effect, whether it’s a TT trick or a Chinese trick. You create the usual bubbles to attack using the IZ launch scheme and possibly the free second level version. Since this is not a single block / space, the attack only chooses who enters its area.

How about the pressure coming from the second level? Because this structure works, it removes the protection of the acoustic energy from failure after pressing. With powerful blocking techniques you are more likely to choose second-level blockers than linear tricks.

In essence, the miscarriage itself comes out of the gap, allowing more to move at its own speed, and it can be closed to allow a wider path to move to the second level that opens it up.

Now let’s look at the structure before the OSU transformation, which just asks about the structure. Outwardly it is certainly like thunder, with an overload on the most powerful aspect of the design.

They then moved on to something more balanced but still VOC related. This almost certainly limits teams in doubles, given how tough they are, but I consider it a crime to disagree with the ability to move and seal the LB from the internal OL and create a first-class treadmill.

So it’s not easy, it never happens, but based on structure and trends, there are a few arguments here, so OSU calls the drama an effective end to this.

But in the end ...

After all, running in this state still requires poor gameplay. why Because it’s really hard to stand 5 feet on the ground and make sure of that. No game theory, it works or not. And the difference you have is very small. Now it’s an RPO, so there are quite a few options that can be expected to play in anticipation of defensive games. Yes, the RPO could work if the defenders did this and that. The problem is that when they do “other” things you don’t think about, you’re done. This will not happen when playing a pass. Yes, gradient concepts are designed to work best on certain surfaces, but they always adapt to give you at least one shot.

And in the end, OSU recorded the same “other” and the legal drama perished, as there was no better alternative to RPO.