Inside the Playbook: Nebraska's Insert Iso - Bubble Slant RPO

Nebraska battled Michigan last weekend to get more tackles on both sides of the ball, but that wasn't the case as there were no plans for a tie. At first, these exciting little circles were missed. Although I prefer it before exploring further, it is a good plan to generate a TD if it is not recommended by DL. So let's take a closer look.

enter jesus
One of the biggest trends in college football lately is the " Enter Icon " game. The idea is effectively the same as the traditional exclusion game . In the first stage, OL doubles the human barrier and creates an unsafe secondary defense. The name of the game Jesus comes from a special defender "different" from a key defender.

Enter H instead of FB. Typically, the posterior H begins to shift into arm position and enters secondary block through LOS. This is a very low drip plan, and the best way to stop it is to insert the cap firmly and quickly into the hole. However, with the relatively new formation process and development of the game itself, many LBs are reluctant to go downhill quickly depending on each key.

Fut Jesus RPO
Like I said, the best way to keep the isolation game going is to stick to the key blocks in the pits. Close the hole and it is very difficult to find a place to escape. This is a very fast and cheap disgusting game so response time is important.

At that time, the only way to use this defensive response was to blow it up. Give a brief overview of how to run and hit the ball to LB's head and be safe in the future. Although pop transitions come back into fashion a bit later, the cheapest and most popular way to use this step is via the RPO. The quick and strong response to Jesus provides a clear secondary reading compared to QB.

bubble - letter
Bubble screens have long been popular for pairing screens with cliffs. This can be done in a closed door activity or in a bubble with a man.

Let's look at these three methods and explain each of them briefly.

This method uses the bubble catcher with two shields, provides the outer shield control, and the shield tries to follow the inner catcher. Here, the tilted catcher blurred the block before going in, like a traditional bubble screen.

The tilt here comes from receiver 2, which can blur the block at first, like in the example above. The advantage here is that you still have a bubble of choice between #1 and #3. During the visit, you as the defense officer do more security or anti-LB than CB. This increases the chances of opening the trend on its own.

On the plus side, game safety often has more than 2 supports and can shorten the slope. If the safety bar is more than 3 and you read bubbles, you can quickly respond to the slope. Center lock can also be disabled, which can derail the bubble option.

Considering how most fences respond to travel, you're bound to get an LB on the cover. As a very receptive inside person, with the help of advanced security at the edge of the game, this tendency can be overcome, because this security cannot be used. If security assistance comes from distant security, it is more likely to be concentrated on straight paths. When combined with an RPO, it works directly on the back of the LB, the environment, or people, with conflicting read resistances. It also saves space in the selection of bubbles.

Damage can put you in the middle of the field and if the defense has a good idea about the future, they are more likely to break away from the field, which may be true. . . Running in Cap 1 is dangerous for a team that is sure to cut any center on its weak side. The other downside is that LB doesn't have to go after anyone to protect them. So, in theory, this bubble-free conflict could persist in the Elbe region.

Two pairs of games.

In theory, there are a lot of things that Isa loves to sprout on this slope. As mentioned, he offers a fast, low running game and LB allows him to read backwards, rather than run/slide. But get Jesus out of LOS (unless you're sure to turn up the Y-TE). Cover the receiver so it doesn't work in the field. This is a bit tricky, but not necessarily a killer.

This secret point is supported by the point. Often the weak side is trying to destroy the players. It has quad connections effectively all the way downfield, and protection is usually adjusted by moving the safety or CB to that field, because one of the receivers may not be straight, but protection is still needed. There must be a vote in the room and a quarter number is needed to calculate the gap. This weakens the dB and is generally used to capture some external influences on the weak side of the field and to protect it from appropriate MOs. So if the defenses aren't smart enough to extend them, they will somehow reduce the risk of these drawdowns.

Bubble movement on all four legs would be excellent for fighting strong security. While more teams rely on fighting the bubble screen from the inside out, they often get a bubble barrier on this protector. Thus, the bubble successfully expands the defenses in the field and divides the ocean between the fields as long as the weak DB does not interfere with its formation.

However, I think it has the potential to prevent conflict, and there are downsides to adaptation. Because WR is four-layer, if you know this you can effectively shut-in wells without a strong safety cover and cut off anything that works vertically. Due to the creation of weapons here, the bubbles do not have enough depth, which makes it difficult to read the solid collision safety; You have not read more protection than the RPO, you rely on open trends.

Similarly, if the damage is smart DB, the broadcaster has a fast delivery house and some OL blocks, so any high OTT output needs to be integrated with the speed distribution concept. This means that Will just hugs. This means that BB can do more than four.

The damage is another opportunity for the DB to be reduced and thus remove the many benefits that the RPO offers.

Best Combination for Bubble-Slant RPO
My feeling is that it makes more sense to implement a traditional 3x1 formation RPO and a combined key space or energy deployment method. Games like Power show the back of a LB who wants to get rid of the top of the line in the same way. TE, although not duplicated, requires at least a Dib to cover and may reduce some cover risks at slope limits and is more likely to "split oceans".

However, the main obstacle to a balanced lineup is that the team that goes to the traditional travel event, known as the solo theory, can theoretically keep all the options here (and if this is trend 3, just go straight to the cover competition).